What's wrong with the Stoic idea of happiness?
PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER GILL, Department of Classics and Ancient History, University of Exeter
Date/Time: 28th October 2008, 17:30
Hear a recording of this lecture
A commonly held view about the Stoic idea of happiness – like their ethical ideas generally – is that it is idealistic but extreme, even inhuman. The Stoics claim that happiness depends entirely on ethical character or understanding and not at all on ‘external’ factors, including one’s own health or wealth and that of one’s loved ones. In this lecture, Christopher Gill looks more closely at the Stoic theory to see if it deserves the sceptical reaction it often receives. He examines the way that, according to Stoicism, happiness is based on character and understanding. He also explores the implications of Stoic thinking about personal and social development for making sense of their ideas about virtue and happiness. In effect, the Stoics see human life as a kind of ongoing journey towards perfection – a journey open to all of us – a side of the theory not always appreciated by critics of Stoicism. He concludes by suggesting that, when more fully explained, the Stoic position is more credible than some competing modern accounts of happiness, and that there may, after all, be nothing much wrong with it.
Christopher Gill is Professor of Ancient Thought at the University of Exeter, following earlier appointments at Yale, Bristol and Aberystwyth. He has also held a Research Fellowship at the National Humanities Center (USA) and a Leverhulme Major Research Fellowship. His main field of research is ancient philosophy, especially ancient ideas about ethics and psychology. A special area of interest has been ancient concepts of personality and self; most recently he has also been working on psychology in medical writing, especially Galen. His books include Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue (Oxford, 1996, awarded a Runciman Prize), The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought (Oxford, 2006), and Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism (forthcoming with Oxford University Press). He has also written a commentary on Plato’s Atlantis story (Bristol, 1980), translated Plato’s Symposium for Penguin Classics (1999), and written a general book on Greek Thought (1995). He has edited or co-edited a number of volumes of new essays on topics in Classics and Philosophy, and co-edits Phronesis, a journal on ancient philosophy.